What matters for Representation Alignment: Global Information or Spatial Structure?

Representation alignment helps generation by distilling representations from a pretrained vision encoder to intermediate diffusion features. We investigate a fundamental question - `what aspect of the target representation matters for generation, its global information (measured by Imagenet1K accuracy) or its spatial structure (pairwise cosine similarity between patch tokens)''? Prevalent wisdom holds that stronger global performance leads to better generation as a target representation. To study this, we first perform a large-scale empirical analysis across 27 different vision encoders and different model scales. The results are surprising - spatial structure, rather than global performance drives the generation performance of a target representation. To further study this, we introduce two straightforward modifications, which specifically accentuate the transfer of spatial information. We replace the standard MLP projection layer in REPA with a simple convolution layer and introduce a spatial normalization layer for the external representation. Surprisingly, our simple method (implemented in <4 lines of code), termed iREPA, consistently improves convergence speed of REPA, across a diverse set of vision encoders, model sizes, and training variants (such as REPA, REPA-E, meanflow, JiT etc). Our work motivates revisiting the fundamental working mechanism of representational alignment and how it can be leveraged for improved training of generative models.