Pushing Test-Time Scaling Limits of Deep Search with Asymmetric Verification

Test-time compute can be scaled both sequentially and in parallel. Sequential scaling involves lengthening the generation process, while parallel scaling involves verifying and selecting among multiple candidate outputs. Combining these two strategies has led to the most powerful AI systems, such as Grok 4 Heavy, GPT-5 Pro, and Gemini-2.5 Pro Deep Think. A key observation is that, in certain contexts (e.g., solving Sudoku puzzles), verifying responses can be substantially easier than generating them. This property, referred to as \emph{asymmetric verification}, highlights the strong potential of test-time scaling. In this work, we study both sequential and parallel test-time scaling of deep search agents, motivated by the intuition that verification in this setting is often much easier than generation. In experiments, we first show that sequential scaling methods, such as budget forcing, can be effective initially but eventually degrade performance when over-applied in agentic search. Due to asymmetric verification, however, we are able to achieve substantial improvements by allocating only a modest amount of compute to the verifier. We conduct experiments with flagship open-source models, including GLM-4.5, K2, Qwen3-2507 and Tongyi-DeepResearch, and extend them to their ``Heavy'' variants through test-time scaling. These deep research agents achieve improvements of up to 20 absolute points on benchmarks such as BrowseComp. Remarkably, as an open-source alternative, GLM-4.5 Heavy reaches accuracy of {\bf 54.0\%} on BrowseComp, {\bf 66.0\%} on GAIA, and {\bf 68.0\%} on xbench-DeepSearch, placing it on par with the best proprietary choices such as OpenAI Deep Research and o3. Tongyi-DeepResearch Heavy pushes performance even further, attaining {\bf 69.0\%} accuracy on BrowseComp.