Shedding Light on Task Decomposition in Program Synthesis: The Driving Force of the Synthesizer Model

Task decomposition is a fundamental mechanism in program synthesis, enabling complex problems to be broken down into manageable subtasks.ExeDec, a state-of-the-art program synthesis framework, employs this approach by combining a Subgoal Model for decomposition and a Synthesizer Model for program generation to facilitate compositional generalization. In this work, we develop REGISM, an adaptation of ExeDec that removes decomposition guidance and relies solely on iterative execution-driven synthesis.By comparing these two exemplary approaches—ExeDec, which leverages task decomposition, and REGISM, which does not—we investigate the interplay between task decomposition and program generation.Our findings indicate that ExeDec exhibits significant advantages in length generalization and concept composition tasks, likely due to its explicit decomposition strategies. At the same time, REGISM frequently matches or surpasses ExeDec’s performance across various scenarios, with its solutions often aligning more closely with ground truth decompositions.These observations highlight the importance of repeated execution-guided synthesis in driving task-solving performance, even within frameworks that incorporate explicit decomposition strategies.Our analysis suggests that task decomposition approaches like ExeDec hold significant potential for advancing program synthesis, though further work is needed to clarify when and why these strategies are most effective.